Fair enough; I took it to refer to “PhysicsCollisionHandler” because I happened to have posted in the thread that I think gave rise to this one, I think.
(The name “PhysicsCollisionHandler” is, I do think, one that’s likely to spawn such mistakes: very similar to the name of another class, and breaking the nomenclature of the other classes in its group.)
True, but I do think that it might be a good idea to give the relationship a small section of its own – it’s quite a useful tidbit, and thus something that I think is worth giving a little prominence.
I don’t know; the class being new might explain its absence from the heirarchies of its parents, but I wouldn’t expect that to result in the lack of a heirarchy on PhysicsCollisionHandler’s own page. I think that I’ve read about errors with the tool that produces the class reference – perhaps this is something like that?