Well, first I’d like to know if the above problem is solved now, i. e. does the 547 snapshot (or later) work for you?
Nope. It’s 20-30 hours of work to write such a documentation, and since we are going to rewrite the PhysX module for PhysX 3.2 (or later) I don’t think it’s worth the effort. But of course we are very happy if someone likes to contribute some pages.
Good idea.
Hmm, this is probably a doxygen configuration problem. It’s just the Python docs which are missing. The C++ API docs have pages for the various PhysX classes.